2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1963 Maserati 5000 GT
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati 5000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati 5000 GT would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati 5000 GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati 5000 GT (335 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati 5000 GT should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 210 kg more than 1963 Maserati 5000 GT.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Maserati 5000 GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 1963 Maserati 5000 GT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
Model | Equinox | 5000 GT |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3423 cc | 4939 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |