2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1967 Seat 1500
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 502 kg more than 1967 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 1967 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Equinox | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1479 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2660 mm |
