2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,423 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 530 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Equinox | Celica |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3423 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2640 mm |