2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1982 Chrysler Cordoba
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,193 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chrysler Cordoba is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chrysler Cordoba has automatic transmission and 2004 Chevrolet Equinox has manual transmission. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chrysler Cordoba will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 1982 Chrysler Cordoba | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
| Model | Equinox | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 5193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2880 mm |
