2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1984 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Skoda L would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1984 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1984 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 834 kg more than 1984 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 1984 Skoda L | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | Equinox | L |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 828 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |
