2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Equinox. (285 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 1998 Honda SSM | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Equinox | SSM |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 286 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2580 mm |
