2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 3,423 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 960 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 2004 Chevrolet Equinox has manual transmission. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Equinox | AZ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3423 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2370 mm |