2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 792 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 2005 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Equinox | Wagon R+ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |