2004 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 607 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Equinox | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Equinox | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 70 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |