2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 1963 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Express | Bellel |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 112 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.7:1 |
Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 40 L |