2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 876 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (386 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Express | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4818 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 138 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 45 L |