2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1965 Holden EH
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 285 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (386 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Holden EH. (238 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Express | 1965 Holden EH | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Express | EH |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4818 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 238 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2680 mm |
