2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (285 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1367 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (441 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Express | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 64 L |