2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1966 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1187 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Express | 1966 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Express | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 6385 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 102.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 96 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 1179 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 45 L |
