2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1426 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Express | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Express | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 57 L |
