2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 5,970 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (300 HP) has 261 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1781 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (488 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (75 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Express | Polo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5970 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 75 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 59 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2481 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 40 L |