2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1990 Ford RS 200. (250 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford RS 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 290 kg more than 1990 Ford RS 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (386 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford RS 200. (292 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford RS 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Express | RS 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4818 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 292 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 77.7 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 54 L |