2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (108 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1337 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (339 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Express | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2402 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2510 mm |