2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 172 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (386 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Express | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Express | Artic |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4818 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 68 L |
