2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 802 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (339 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (270 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Express | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 16.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2402 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |