2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (420 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 132 kg more than 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee (570 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (339 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Express | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 570 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2402 kg | 2270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 21.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 19.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 80 L |