2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 179 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (391 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Express | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 391 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 2545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 104 L |