2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (339 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Express | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Express | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 57 L |
