2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2010 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2010 Lotus Evora is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lotus Evora (400 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Evora weights approximately 521 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Express. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lotus Evora (459 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (386 Nm). This means 2010 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2010 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Express | Evora |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4818 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 459 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1991 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 3063 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 90 L |