2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2010 Maybach 62
To start off, 2010 Maybach 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Maybach 62 (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 409 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Maybach 62 weights approximately 510 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Express. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Maybach 62 (999 Nm) has 646 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2010 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2010 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maybach |
Model | Express | 62 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 999 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2366 kg | 2876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 3828 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 110 L |