2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 701 kg more than 2010 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Express | Rogue |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 237 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2222 kg | 1521 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |