2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 178 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Express. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-150 (387 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Express | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 387 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2222 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 2093 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 125 L |