2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (195 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 258 kg more than 2011 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (353 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Express | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 366 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2222 kg | 1964 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 76 L |