2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 522 kg more than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (450 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Express | F-TYPE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 450 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2402 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2909 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |