2004 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 563 kg more than 2013 Jeep Wrangler.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Express | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 353 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2402 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 70 L |