2004 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1959 Fiat 750
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fiat 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fiat 750 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1959 Fiat 750. (41 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1959 Fiat 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 955 kg more than 1959 Fiat 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Fiat 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Fiat 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Fiat 750. (54 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Fiat 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Impala | 1959 Fiat 750 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | Impala | 750 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 54 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 61 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 64 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 37 L |
