2004 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1970 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 600 kg more than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Impala | 1970 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 134 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2210 mm |