2004 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1982 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 4000.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Impala | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Impala | 4000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |