2004 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (157 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 260 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (275 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Impala | 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Impala | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 3301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 275 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3040 mm |