2004 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 785 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Impala.

Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Impala. (305 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Impala.

Compare all specifications: