2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1955 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1955 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1955 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1955 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1955 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Talbot |
| Model | Malibu | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
