2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 865 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1959 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Malibu | 600 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 28 L |
