2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1960 Simca Vedette
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Vedette would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 395 kg more than 1960 Simca Vedette.
Because 1960 Simca Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Simca Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1960 Simca Vedette | |
Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
Model | Malibu | Vedette |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 42 L |