2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1961 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (197 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 368 kg more than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (299 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1961 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Grand Break |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 37 L |