2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 60 kg more than 1962 Humber Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Humber |
| Model | Malibu | Hawk |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 110 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |
