2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (146 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 420 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Malibu | 220 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 45 L |