2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 574 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Malibu | 1500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 52 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 40 L |