2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1966 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 544 kg more than 1966 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1966 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Malibu | 312 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 81 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 43 L |