2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1967 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1967 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 872 kg more than 1967 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1967 Renault Dauphine | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Malibu | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 57 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 58 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 38 L |