2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 553 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Malibu | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2210 mm |
