2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 594 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 616 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 124 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1504 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |