2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Chrysler Cordoba
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,193 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chrysler Cordoba is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chrysler Cordoba. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Chrysler Cordoba | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
| Model | Malibu | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 5193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |
