2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 289 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Chrysler E | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
| Model | Malibu | E |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2630 mm |
