2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo would be higher.
Because 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo has manual transmission. 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lamborghini |
| Model | Malibu | Marco Polo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1310 mm |
