2004 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 615 kg more than 1982 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Malibu 1982 Seat Ritmo
Make Chevrolet Seat
Model Malibu Ritmo
Year Released 2004 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3491 cc 1196 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 92 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1495 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2460 mm